Effects of Competition of Dialysis Facility Service Levels and Patient Selection
ResearchPublished 1993
ResearchPublished 1993
Chronic dialysis is one of the modalities for treating end stage renal disease (ESRD). This research examines the competitiveness of hemodialysis markets and investigates how market competition is related to dialysis provider strategies for service levels and patient selection, and to patient outcomes. It is a cross-sectional study that uses 1990 data from the Medicare ESRD program, which provides insurance coverage for essentially all individuals with ESRD. Findings indicate that the competitiveness of local dialysis markets varies widely, that competition appears to increase facility acceptance of sicker patients, and that competitive effects on facility service strategies for staffing and dialyzer reuse are not strong. Higher productivity does not appear to be associated with poorer patient outcomes. These results highlight the need for better information on how dialysis facilities gain and exercise market power and on staffing effects on patient outcomes.
This publication is part of the RAND dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.