Cover: Incorporating Traffic Enforcement Racial Profiling Analyses into Police Department Early Intervention Systems

Incorporating Traffic Enforcement Racial Profiling Analyses into Police Department Early Intervention Systems

Published Jan 26, 2007

by Brent D. Fulton

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

In response to legislation, lawsuits, community pressure, and internal concerns, over 4,000 police departments are collecting traffic enforcement data to determine whether their officers racially profile. In this context, racial profiling is defined as when police inappropriately use a motorist’s race as a factor in deciding which motorists to stop, cite, search, and arrest, where the appropriateness of the use of race is defined by the law, consent decrees, and department policies. Most studies have estimated the use of race at the department level, but there is a growing interest to estimate its use at the officer level and incorporate the results into Early Intervention (EI) systems, which identify potential problem officers. For either department- or officer-level studies, the dominant concern is to employ methods that accurately estimate the use of race and distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate uses.

This study summarizes the key implications of incorporating racial profiling analyses into an EI system and improves upon existing methods that estimate the use of race in stop, search, and DUI arrest decisions at both the department and officer levels. The methods are applied to the traffic stops of 16 Washington State Patrol troopers who patrolled South Seattle during 2003 to 2005 in order to estimate the troopers’ average use of race as well as each trooper’s relative use of race as compared to his 15 peers.

For the combined trooper analyses, the study does not find conclusive evidence that the troopers used race as a factor in their stop, search, and DUI arrest decisions. However, the study does find that the use of race significantly varied among the troopers, and a few troopers are identified as potential problem troopers who warrant further scrutiny to determine if they inappropriately used race against minority motorists.

The results lead to two key policy recommendations. First, police departments should strongly consider incorporating traffic enforcement racial profiling analyses into their EI systems in order to identify potential problem officers. Second, methods used to identify potential problem officers need to allow for the possibility that an officer’s peer group may change over time and that non-racial motorist characteristics differentially affect officers’ law enforcement decisions. These types of methods should also be used to identify potential problem officers for other EI system performance indicators.

Research conducted by

This document was submitted as a dissertation in October 2006 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of James N. Dertouzos (Chair), Greg K. Ridgeway, and John M. MacDonald.

This publication is part of the RAND dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.