Mileage-Based User Fee Winners and Losers
An Analysis of the Distributional Implications of Taxing Vehicle Miles Traveled, with Projections, 2010-2030
Download eBook for Free
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 1.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
The mileage-based user fee (MBUF) is a leading alternative to the gasoline tax. Instead of taxing gasoline consumption, the MBUF would directly tax drivers based on their vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The author estimates changes in annual household demand for VMT in response to changes in the cost of driving that result from adopting various MBUF alternatives, and finds that a flat-rate MBUF would be no more or less regressive than fuel taxes, now or in the future. The findings suggest that equity considerations based on ability to pay would not be a significant reason to oppose or support the adoption of MBUFs. While the equity implications of MBUFs are minimal, some groups, especially rural states, may find that the potential equity benefits of MBUFs could be overwhelmed by an increase in the tax rate to cover the higher costs of collecting and administering them. Concerns about the impacts of flat-rate MBUFs on vehicle fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions are valid, but, at current oil prices, the tax rate is a small percentage of the total cost of gasoline. However, it is possible to structure an MBUF that provides incentives for fuel efficiency while maintaining the other favorable qualities of MBUFs, such as their economic efficiency and fiscal sustainability.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Mileage-Based User Fees
Chapter Two
The Equity of Highway User Fees and Taxes
Chapter Three
Data and Model
Chapter Four
Methodology
Chapter Five
The Equity Effects of Mileage-Based User Fees
Chapter Six
Future Distributional Implications, 2010 - 2030
Chapter Seven
Conclusion
Appendix A
Technical Appendix
Appendix B
Additional Tables
Research conducted by
This document was submitted as a dissertation in March 2012 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Martin Wachs (Chair), Howard Shatz, and Thomas Light.
This publication is part of the RAND Corporation Dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.