Cover: Three Essays on Subjective Well-Being

Three Essays on Subjective Well-Being

Published Sep 29, 2014

by Caroline Tassot

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

This dissertation comprises three essays that empirically study different aspects of subjective well-being (SWB) indictors. The first approach takes a methodological angle to assess the reliability and validity of SWB indicators. The second and third essays study the determinants of SWB at the individual level and macroeconomic level, respectively. In particular, the second essay estimates the effect of work transitions on SWB, while the third examines the relationship between income inequality and SWB.

Research conducted by

This document was submitted as a dissertation in May 2014 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Arie Kapteyn (Chair), Richard Easterlin, and Susann Rohwedder.

This publication is part of the RAND dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.