Possibility or Utopia?

Consumer Choice in Health Care: A Literature Review

Ineke van Beusekom, Silke Tonshoff, Han de Vries, Connor Spreng, Emmett B. Keeler

ResearchPublished Dec 13, 2004

This literature review examines consumer choice in health insurance plans against the background of the German health system in order to inform the questions: What are models of consumer choice and their effects?, and: If consumers want lower cost health care, what instruments can insurers use to provide it and what are the likely effects of those instruments? The review looked at experiences in other industrialized countries, especially the United States, for consumer choice options such as co-payments, reimbursement/bonuses, and deductibles, as well as organizational designs such as gatekeeper systems and selective contracting. In addition to cost-containment measures, the review also examined what was known about effects on health status, satisfaction, fairness and the macro-economic situation. The review describes the health economics theory of consumer choice, the methodology for the literature review, the German health system, and studies on consumer choice of insurers and providers, and reflects on their relevance on the German system.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2004
  • Pages: 168
  • Document Number: TR-105

Citation

RAND Style Manual
van Beusekom, Ineke, Silke Tonshoff, Han de Vries, Connor Spreng, and Emmett B. Keeler, Possibility or Utopia? Consumer Choice in Health Care: A Literature Review, RAND Corporation, TR-105, 2004. As of October 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR105.html
Chicago Manual of Style
van Beusekom, Ineke, Silke Tonshoff, Han de Vries, Connor Spreng, and Emmett B. Keeler, Possibility or Utopia? Consumer Choice in Health Care: A Literature Review. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2004. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR105.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was prepared for the Bertelsmann Foundation and conducted within RAND Europe.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.