Study on Appropriate Methodologies to Better Measure Consumer Preferences for Postal Services

Final Report

Charlene Rohr, Urs Trinkner, Alison Lawrence, Priscillia Hunt, Chong Woo Kim, Dimitris Potoglou, Robert Sheldon

ResearchPublished Jan 16, 2012

Cover: Study on Appropriate Methodologies to Better Measure Consumer Preferences for Postal Services

Post services have steadily evolved over centuries as the key means for long-distance communication between people. Every year European consumers hand over about 135 billion postal items to postal operators, who deliver them throughout the European Community. However, the postal sector is facing a series of challenges calling for significant transformation. The past decades have brought about a rapid development of new communication and information technologies which have an impact on consumers' needs and priorities for postal services. Some of these technologies have had the role of replacing more traditional mail services, and have led to pronounced erosion in postal volumes, whilst others have spurred the growth of certain market segments, like parcels and small packets. In the case of regulated services, like postal services, such developments in consumer demand are not immediately matched by changes in supply — they must be identified and addressed through policy decisions. It is therefore vitally important that policy makers understand consumers' needs and preferences for postal services. This study aims to provide such information by developing a methodology, based around stated preference discrete choice experiments, and implementing it in three member states: Italy, Poland and Sweden. We examine and quantify consumers' preferences for postal services, for business and residential consumers, for letter and parcel services. Based on the findings and lessons learned, the study provides a toolkit for member states that wish to conduct quantitative market research to better understand their citizens' needs for postal services.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Rohr, Charlene, Urs Trinkner, Alison Lawrence, Priscillia Hunt, Chong Woo Kim, Dimitris Potoglou, and Robert Sheldon, Study on Appropriate Methodologies to Better Measure Consumer Preferences for Postal Services: Final Report, RAND Corporation, TR-1140-EC, 2011. As of September 23, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1140.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Rohr, Charlene, Urs Trinkner, Alison Lawrence, Priscillia Hunt, Chong Woo Kim, Dimitris Potoglou, and Robert Sheldon, Study on Appropriate Methodologies to Better Measure Consumer Preferences for Postal Services: Final Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2011. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1140.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this document was prepared for the Internal Market and Services DG MARKT/2010/14/E and conducted by RAND Europe.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.