Career Paths of School Administrators in North Carolina
Insights from an Analysis of State Data
ResearchPublished Dec 13, 2004
Insights from an Analysis of State Data
ResearchPublished Dec 13, 2004
State and federal governments have been increasing school accountability requirements and relying on school administrators to promote improvement. Anecdotal evidence suggests that schools and districts are finding it difficult to attract and retain qualified people to serve as administrators because there is a shortage of such people, but recent empirically based analyses show there is no shortage. This report explores this issue further, adding to the current understanding of school administrators’ careers through an in-depth analysis of administrative data from the state of North Carolina. A comprehensive, descriptive overview of school administrators is presented, along with a model of the individual and school characteristics associated with various career transitions. The authors describe in detail what state-level administrative data can reveal about the careers of school administrators, what the data cannot reveal, and how further research and data collection might be directed so that systematic administrative data can be used to better understand the relationship between administrative career paths and student learning outcomes. This report is one of a group of companion reports; the others cover similar analyses for New York and Illinois.
The research described in this report was prepared for the Wallace Foundation by RAND Education.
This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.