Determinants of Productivity for Military Personnel
A Review of Findings on the Contribution of Experience, Training, and Aptitude to Military Performance
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||0.4 MB|
|PDF file||0.1 MB|
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback85 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
Reviews the primary literature and empirical findings related to three major factors that affect military personnel productivity: experience, training, and ability. The majority of studies concerning the relationship between productivity and experience, training, or aptitude find that each of these three factors contributes significantly to personnel productivity. Most studies confirm that careerists are several times as productive as first-term personnel, although the size of the experience differential is likely to vary based on the nature and requirements of a given occupation. Additional training can improve proficiency, reduce performance error, and lead to a higher technical skill level among personnel. Finally, a higher score on the Armed Forces Qualification Test (as a measure of ability) seems to be positively correlated with higher levels of performance on both individual and group-based military tasks. Because most of this literature is now somewhat outdated, issues relating the determinants of personnel productivity should be reevaluated in the context of transformation and the developments associated with it. An appendix summarizes the studies, describes the method used in each, and provides qualitative and quantitative results in tabular form.
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted in the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center supported by the OSD, the Joint Staff, the unified commands, and the defense agencies.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.