The Evidence Base for the Classification of Drugs

Ruth Levitt, Edward Nason, Michael Hallsworth

ResearchPublished Feb 10, 2006

This report, prepared for the UK House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology, presents the results of four case studies examining the evidence base for the classification of illegal drugs in the context of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. It identifies the main evidence on the selected drugs (amphetamines and ecstasy, cocaine, magic mushrooms and cannabis) and examines the use of that evidence in classifying each drug. The report also briefly examines the classification systems in three other countries (the USA, Sweden and the Netherlands), giving information on the penalties and treatment regimes associated with them.

The report provides a short introduction to the history of drug classification in the UK and general issues surrounding the types of evidence used in classifying drugs. The case studies examine the evidence of physical, social, psychological and economic harm associated with each drug and the use of that evidence by in government in making policy. This report does not aim to provide a comprehensive review of all the evidence available for the drugs or countries; rather it provides an overview of the evidence on drugs and classification systems, to assist the members of the committee to direct questions to witnesses in areas of specific interest to them for more in depth view information. The report may also be of wider interest to Parliament and others.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2006
  • Pages: 84
  • Document Number: TR-362-HOC

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Levitt, Ruth, Edward Nason, and Michael Hallsworth, The Evidence Base for the Classification of Drugs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2006. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR362.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.