Health care facilities usually have general disaster plans for dealing with the medical consequences of public health emergencies. However, most of their disaster plans do not address the psychological consequences of such events. These training manuals are designed to fill the gap by providing curricula that can be used to train hospital and clinic staff and department of mental health staff who would be deployed to hospitals and clinics about how to prepare for and respond to the psychological consequences of large-scale disasters. Meredith et al. include three separate training modules to address the needs of three audiences: (1) administrators and disaster planning and response staff in hospitals and clinics; (2) clinical, mental health, and non-clinicalstaff in hospitals and clinics; (3) disaster mental health staff in Los Angeles County. Terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and other large-scale public health emergencies such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or pandemic flu can result in a large number of psychological casualties. Large-scale disasters can stress the capacity of hospitals and clinics to deal with the psychological consequences — the emotional, behavioral, and cognitive reactions — that could result from a terrorist or other public health event for victims, families, and staff members. The materials in these manuals are intended to be flexible so that hospital and clinic disaster coordinators can tailor a training session to the needs of local staff.

All trainer, participant, and self-study manuals as well as the various tools described in the manual are downloadable from the the Los Angeles County Web site.

This work was collaboratively produced by the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Emergency Management Services (EMS) Agency and the RAND Corporation with funding provided by the Hospital Preparedness Program grant.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.