Research Brief
Digital preservation: The uncertain future of saving the past
Mar 18, 2008
Recommendations to the Forum Standaardisatie
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 1.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Electronic government (eGovernment) can improve public sector effectiveness by augmenting traditional channels of interaction among citizens, businesses, and government agencies. To realize this vision, eGovernment services eServices) must be interoperable: they must work together, sharing compatible and meaningful information to help reduce the cost of government, increase its cost-effectiveness, coherence, consistency, accessibility, and responsiveness, and potentially improve democracy by making government more transparent, accountable, and credible. Significant challenges to creating interoperable eServices of this kind stem from functional, technical, procedural, cultural, and semantic differences among the organizations that provide them. This report presents the results of a study intended to help the Forum Standaardisatie develop a Dutch interoperability framework (IF), which is seen as a key step in promoting eGovernment in The Netherlands, as well as Dutch participation in emerging pan-European government Services. The report analyses a sample of existing IFs as well as related enterprise architecture efforts, in order to identify the range of potential goals and components of an IF. It then maps the goals of an IF to its composition, in order to develop recommendations for which components should comprise a Dutch IF. Adoption and success factors for existing IFs are also analyzed, along with key features of the Dutch social and governmental context, including the relationship between an IF and the Nederlandse Overheids Referentie Architectuur effort. These factors are used to develop recommendations for how a Dutch IF should be developed and governed.
Chapter One
Overview
Chapter Two
What is interoperability?
Chapter Three
Interoperability frameworks and related architectures
Chapter Four
The Dutch situation
Chapter Five
Governance of a Dutch interoperability framework
Chapter Six
Recommendations and next steps
Appendix A
Multiple views of interoperability
Appendix B
Key technical concepts related to interoperability
Appendix C
Detailed analyses of sample interoperability frameworks
The research described in this report was prepared for the Forum Standaardisatie, The Netherlands and was conducted by RAND Europe.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.