Local Authority Commissioning

Understanding the use of information and evidence by commissioners of services

by Emma Disley, Lila Rabinovich, Jennifer Rubin

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

RAND Europe was commissioned by the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA) to undertake a piece of exploratory research examining the types of data and information which Local Authorities draw upon to make commissioning decisions. The research focused on the field of community safety, crime and violence, and is based on twenty-three interviews with informants involved in commissioning at the local, regional, and central Government level. This research raises questions about what ‘counts’ as evidence about what works; our findings suggest that the label ‘good practice’ is often applied to services or interventions on the basis of professional judgment rather than evidence from evaluation. This, however, was rarely questioned by interviewees, who reported satisfaction with both the quantity and quality of information available about effective interventions.

We found that commissioning processes tend to rely upon practitioners’ informal, local knowledge of potential providers, and there is a tendency to re-commission known organisations. We highlight concerns that this may disadvantage small or new providers.

Our findings also suggest there was little evaluation of the impacts of interventions at the local level. Whilst most areas use simple ‘before and after’ information to evaluate an intervention, the data collected related mostly to throughput and process rather than outcomes; interviewees were, however, aware of the limits on their ability to carry out evaluations. We conclude the report by suggesting a number of possible tools and initiatives that could support commissioners of public services in making value for money decisions.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction and background

  • Chapter Two

    Information about local social challenges and policy priorities

  • Chapter Three

    Information on what works in addressing policy priorities

  • Chapter Four

    Identifying and selecting service providers

  • Chapter Five

    Evaluation and performance monitoring

  • Chapter Six

    Conclusions

  • Appendix A

    Methodology and approach

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was prepared for the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts and conducted by RAND Europe.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.