Changing the translational research landscape

A review of the impacts of Biomedical Research Centres in England

Sonja Marjanovic, Bryony Soper, Alaa Shehabi, Claire Celia, Anais Reding, Tom Ling

ResearchPublished Nov 9, 2009

This report describes a review of the Biomedical Research Centres (BRC) scheme, undertaken for the DH 18 months after the BRCs were commissioned. This review was a perceptions audit of senior executives involved in the scheme, and explored whether the scheme is working in the way intended. It considered how translational research and innovation were pursued prior to the BRC scheme (including the opportunities and barriers experienced in the past by NHS and academic partners); whether and how institutional relationships are changing because of the scheme; and (if so) how these changes are influencing the health research system. The information obtained through our interviews suggests that the BRC scheme is already contributing to observable changes in institutional relationships between the NHS, academia, industry and other players, and is helping shape the health research system to pursue translational research and innovation with the clear goal of realising patient benefit. The scheme, and the associated changes in stakeholder relationships it has fostered, is also making a significant contribution to capacity-building in the health research system, and is leading to improved resource-targeting, management and governance.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2009
  • Pages: 71
  • Document Number: TR-787-DH

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Marjanovic, Sonja, Bryony Soper, Alaa Shehabi, Claire Celia, Anais Reding, and Tom Ling, Changing the translational research landscape: A review of the impacts of Biomedical Research Centres in England. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR787.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.