A historical reflection on research evaluation studies, their recurrent themes and challenges

Sonja Marjanovic, Stephen Hanney, Steven Wooding

ResearchPublished Dec 7, 2009

This report presents a historical reflection on research evaluation studies, their recurrent themes and challenges, and their implications. It critically examines studies of how scientific research drives innovation and socioeconomic benefits.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2009
  • Pages: 53
  • Document Number: TR-789-RS

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Marjanovic, Sonja, Stephen Hanney, and Steven Wooding, A historical reflection on research evaluation studies, their recurrent themes and challenges. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR789.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.

Version Note

This publication supersedes a previous version published in 2007 (WR-466-RS).