Reactive Armor Tiles for Army and Marine Corps Armored Vehicles

An Independent Report to the Department of Defense and the United States Congress

John Pinder

ResearchPublished 1999

This independent report on the results of a congressionally mandated study of reactive armor (RA) tiles for U.S. Army and Marine Corps armored vehicles was submitted to Congress in April 1999. It relies on an extensive supporting analysis conducted by the U.S. Army Materiel and Systems Analysis Activity in cooperation with the U.S. Army Research Laboratory. The study focused on two Army vehicles, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) and the M113 family of vehicles. Three types of RA tiles were evaluated: the current "production" BFV tile, a new "1-2 year" developmental M113 tile, and a more advanced "2-3 year" design. All of these designs significantly improved vehicle survivability, but the 2-3 year tiles provided the most robust protection for both vehicles against likely 2005 threats. In the case of the M113, however, the somewhat lighter and less costly 1-2 year tiles might be preferred in situations where advanced threats are not so prevalent. The report makes several policy recommendations: (1) The Army should develop a new universal enhanced RA tile based on the 2-3 year design for both the BFV and the M113, at an estimated cost of $11 million. This effort should include the development of an optimum coverage pattern for the weight-constrained M113A3 tile sets. (2) Enough additional production tile sets should be procured to equip a substantial portion of the BFVs in the Army's Contingency Response Forces, and a sufficient number of the new enhanced tile sets should be procured to outfit an additional brigade of BFVs. At least this many M113A3 enhanced tile sets should also be procured, plus enough additional sets to meet identified needs. (3) Further research should be done on the need for RA tiles on M113s in their typical roles and missions, and on the appropriateness of RA for urban operations. Also, the Marine Corps and the Army should consider whether the new universal RA tile would be appropriate for other vehicles in the future, especially those being considered for the Army After Next.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
65 pages
List Price
$15.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1999
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 65
  • Paperback Price: $15.00
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/WP119
  • Document Number: WP-119

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Pinder, John, Reactive Armor Tiles for Army and Marine Corps Armored Vehicles: An Independent Report to the Department of Defense and the United States Congress, RAND Corporation, WP-119, 1999. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/white_papers/WP119.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Pinder, John, Reactive Armor Tiles for Army and Marine Corps Armored Vehicles: An Independent Report to the Department of Defense and the United States Congress. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1999. https://www.rand.org/pubs/white_papers/WP119.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND white paper series. The white paper was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 and was meant to convey information on a policy issue and to summarize key research findings relevant to pending decisions or policy problems. White papers drew on a strong body of research and were directed to a specific audience.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.