Teachers’ Responses to Standards-Based Accountability
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||0.3 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) requires all states to adopt standards-based accountability (SBA) systems to monitor school performance. States’ SBA systems vary in their details, but all involve content and achievement standards, statewide tests, and systems of intervention and other consequences associated with performance on those tests. The Implementing Standards-Based Accountability (ISBA) project is examining how district staff, principals, and teachers are responding to the SBA provisions under NCLB, and is exploring the relationships between these responses and subsequent student achievement gains (see Stecher et al., 2005, in this symposium for study details). In this paper we present preliminary data from the study, with a focus on classroom-level responses to SBA among mathematics and science teachers.
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation and conducted within RAND Education.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.