Cover: Examining the Validity Evidence for California Teacher Licensure Exams

Examining the Validity Evidence for California Teacher Licensure Exams

Published Dec 28, 2005

by Vi-Nhuan Le, Richard Buddin

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

This paper is part of a larger research project “Teacher Licensure Tests and Student Achievement” that is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences in the United States Department of Education. The ultimate goal of the project is to assess how the performance of teachers on state licensure tests affects the classroom effectiveness of individual teachers as measured by the student achievement gains of their students. This paper reviews the literature on teacher licensure exams and assesses evidence for the validity of the subject matter, reading pedagogy, and general knowledge tests that are administered to California teacher candidates as part of state licensure procedures.

The research described in this report was prepared for the United States Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences and conducted by RAND Education.

This report is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.