Cover: Providing Performance Feedback to Individual Physicians

Providing Performance Feedback to Individual Physicians

Current Practice and Emerging Lessons: Final Report

Published Aug 7, 2006

by Stephanie S. Teleki, Rebecca Shaw, Cheryl L. Damberg, Elizabeth A. McGlynn

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

There is increasing interest in and capability to assess the performance of individual physicians. However, because such activities are relatively new and often proprietary, lessons learned in applied settings frequently remain unknown to others. This report summarizes findings from the published literature and interviews with 12 key informants who were asked questions about their physician-level reporting activities. Regarding content, report sponsors should be honest and direct about the purpose; peer comparisons, actionable feedback, and achievable benchmarks are compelling. Regarding format, there is no definitive guidance; experience to date suggests that reports should be designed to provide a readily understandable snapshot of performance (e.g., rank-ordering results so high and low scores are obvious). There are many options for the report medium: printed hard copies; electronic static copies; and flexible web versions. Although web formats allow users to tailor information, many physicians do not have convenient web access or are not accustomed to using this medium. Thus, care should be taken to meet the needs of the intended audience. In terms of the reporting process, physicians should be involved early and often in development and implementation, and allowed to question data and make changes if errors are uncovered. Importantly, the passive provision of information alone is not sufficient to bring about behavior change. Multi-faceted approaches are more effective, such as interactive educational sessions, coupled with the use of local opinion leaders, and/or feedback reports. Many questions remain about how best to provide performance information to individual physicians; more research is needed.

The research described in this report was performed under the auspices of RAND Health.

This report is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.