China Rural Health Insurance Experiment

Final Report

by Shan Cretin, Albert P. Williams, Jeffrey Sine

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Cooperative medical systems (CMS) were developed in rural China as the primary method of delivering and financing health care. At their peak, they provided limited health coverage for 85 to 90 percent of the population. But the CMS system has broken down, probably because of agricultural and market reforms that had a disruptive impact on the village welfare funds that supported CMS. Many cooperative systems disbanded, leaving many people uninsured. The primary purpose of the China Rural Health Insurance Experiment project is to provide a sound analytic basis for designing sustainable health care financing mechanisms for China’s rural population. The model of health care financing used in this project is a form of “managed care” in which a health insurance mechanism is integrated into the existing primary care system. Using the model, the authors estimate changes in per-patient expenditures for such a plan.

The research described in this report was performed under the auspices of RAND Health.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.