Improving and Enhancing Telephone-based Disease Surveillance Systems in Local Health Departments
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||0.2 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
This report presents the findings of a project designed to identify system-level characteristics associated with consistently timely responses in telephone-based disease surveillance systems (also known as public health disease reporting systems) in local health departments. The contents of this report will be of interest to a broad range of individuals working directly in public health or on public health systems research, as well as individuals interested more generally in systems-level performance measurement. In particular, this report has direct relevance to public health professionals at the state and local levels who are involved in assessing and improving their systems for detection and response to urgent case reports.
Table of Contents
Literature Review and Case Studies
The research described in this report was prepared for the Department of Health and Human Services under the auspices of RAND Health.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.