Prioritizing Patient Safety Outcomes Measures
Results of an Expert Consensus Process
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||0.7 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
This report presents the results of a modified Delphi consensus process carried out in 2006 as part of the patient safety evaluation. Its purpose was to identify priority outcome measures for use in monitoring and evaluating progress in improving patient safety. Forty-seven individuals, national clinical and research experts in patient safety issues, identified important outcome measures for inpatient care, ambulatory care, and long-term care settings. Identifying these measures represents the first step in a larger process, with needed follow-up work identified for further refinement of measures, decisions regarding which measures should be used for differing applications, and additional validation research to ensure that the measures are documented to be valid for the relevant applications.
The research in this report was prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and conducted by RAND Health.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.