Longitudinal Perceptions of Supportiveness from Biological Fathers and Maternal Mental Health Problems

Sarah O. Meadows

Published Sep 29, 2009

Together, increased popularity of the life course paradigm and availability of longitudinal data addressing family relationships have raised important questions about how family processes should be measured to ensure that longitudinal experiences are accurately captured. Using the Fragile Families and Child Well-Being Study (N = 2,158) this paper focuses on trajectories of mothers’ perceived supportiveness from a biological child’s father and mental health problems five years after the birth. A mother’s relationship status with the father is significantly related to her perceptions of supportiveness with married mothers reporting the highest levels of supportiveness followed by mothers in cohabiting unions, romantic non-residential unions, and finally, mothers not in a romantic relationship with the child’s father. Increasing slopes of supportiveness are associated with fewer subsequent mental health problems, controlling for both time-varying and time-invariant maternal and relationship characteristics. The discussion calls attention to alternate ways in which longitudinal experiences can be modeled.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2009
  • Pages: 46
  • Document Number: WR-702

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Meadows, Sarah O., Longitudinal Perceptions of Supportiveness from Biological Fathers and Maternal Mental Health Problems, RAND Corporation, WR-702, 2009. As of September 23, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR702.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Meadows, Sarah O., Longitudinal Perceptions of Supportiveness from Biological Fathers and Maternal Mental Health Problems. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR702.html.
BibTeX RIS

This paper series was made possible by the NIA funded RAND Center for the Study of Aging and the NICHD funded RAND Population Research Center.

This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.