Is it Ethical to Use a Single Probability Density Function?

Robert J. Lempert, David G. Groves, Jordan R. Fischbach

Published May 28, 2013

Addressing climate change requires both quantitative analysis and ethical reasoning. But the character of many climate-related decisions — in particular deep uncertainty, competing values, and complex relationships among actions and consequences — can make it difficult to use the most common types of quantitative analysis to support appropriate ethical reasoning. This essay will describe Robust Decision Making (RDM), one of a new class of methods for quantitative analysis that can help resolve some of these difficulties, and situate RDM in the framework for ethical reasoning and deliberation laid out in Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice. Two example applications will illustrate these ideas: one examining how greenhouse gas mitigation policies might appropriately address the threat of abrupt climate change and the other addressing management of the Colorado River in the face of climate change and other changing conditions.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Lempert, Robert J., David G. Groves, and Jordan R. Fischbach, Is it Ethical to Use a Single Probability Density Function? RAND Corporation, WR-992-NSF, 2013. As of October 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR992.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Lempert, Robert J., David G. Groves, and Jordan R. Fischbach, Is it Ethical to Use a Single Probability Density Function? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2013. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR992.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was prepared for the National Science Foundation by RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment.

This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.