Principals in Small Districts Receive Far Less 'Instructional Leadership' Support, Survey Shows


Aug 16, 2016

Retro grunge principal's office

Photo by Mr Doomits/Fotolia

This commentary originally appeared on U.S. News & World Report on August 12, 2016.

Until recently, little was known about how much support principals in the United States receive to be effective “instructional leaders,” a buzz phrase in the K-12 education community that refers to the important role principals and other school leaders can play in student learning.

A national survey has provided rare insight on the topic, showing that mentors and supervisors of school leaders do provide feedback focused on principals' role in teaching and learning, although the amount given varies. Principals in small districts receive much less support on this front than those in larger districts, according to the survey, which was funded by the Wallace Foundation.

The survey was conducted at the close of the 2014-15 school year using the RAND Corporation's American School Leader Panel, a nationally representative sample of school leaders across the U.S. that periodically provides perspectives on key education policies and issues.

My RAND colleagues and I found that principals place more value on feedback from mentors and supervisors that emphasizes ways to improve teachers' instruction. A full 100 percent of principals found mentoring to be moderately or very valuable when it focused greatly on instruction. However, when mentoring did not focus on instruction, only 40 percent of principals reported it to be as valuable.

In addition, a recent review by RAND researchers of literature on the topic identified a number of studies that demonstrate that school leaders can boost student achievement when they are focused on supporting and improving classroom instruction. The review also pointed out that the Every Student Succeeds Act, which was signed into law in December, expands opportunities for states and districts to use federal funding for initiatives to improve the quality of school leaders. The American School Leader Panel survey made clear that some principals have greater access to those opportunities than others.

One eye-opening observation from the American School Leader Panel survey: Principals in larger districts receive far more support to help them become successful instructional leaders than principals in smaller districts. About 70 percent of principals in districts with more than 25,000 students reported that their supervisor at least “somewhat” emphasizes instruction in communications with them, compared to less than half of principals in smaller districts.

Principals in smaller districts said they received less mentoring overall and less principal-specific professional development than their peers in larger districts. Less than 30 percent of principals in smaller districts reported that first-year principals are required to receive mentoring compared to 82 percent of principals in larger districts. Principals in smaller districts also consistently reported less mentoring—and less required mentoring—for second- and third-year principals and assistant principals. The comparative lack of mentoring in smaller districts may not come as a surprise, given that smaller districts also often have small central offices, shrinking budgets and superintendents who are expected to wear even more hats than the principal.

What is sometimes glossed over in conversations about instructional leadership is that it can be exceedingly hard to do well. Principals have a dizzying number of administrative responsibilities and then are expected to play a key role in the teaching and learning that happens at their schools across all subjects and grade levels. To be strong instructional leaders, principals need to be given the necessary tools and support. They need mentors and supervisors who will provide consistent feedback on how the principals can support teaching and learning at their individual schools—recurring professional development that will provide them with concrete strategies for improving instruction.

State policymakers and district administrators, as well as regional educational service agencies that support networks of districts, need to find ways for school leaders in smaller districts to receive the same strong, instruction-focused supports that their peers in larger districts do. Possibilities include growing and sustaining both online and in-person networks that provide ongoing and consistent supports for school leaders, as well as hiring more district and school staff beyond the principal to focus on supporting teacher instruction.

Since principals have been shown to be one of the most important factors in a student's educational success, the system needs to get better at helping principals accomplish their most important task—helping educators educate.

Julia H. Kaufman is a policy researcher at the nonprofit, nonpartisan RAND Corporation.

More About This Commentary

Commentary gives RAND researchers a platform to convey insights based on their professional expertise and often on their peer-reviewed research and analysis.