Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

الاتجاهات الناشئة في تعويض الخسائر الواسعة النطاق

Arabic language version

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback34 pages $14.00

Research Questions

  1. How are the roles of regulators changing in the settlement process?
  2. What is the impact of liens on settlements?
  3. What are the pros and cons of aggregating claims?

In a consumer society where widespread losses can easily occur, the processes and procedures for providing compensation to large numbers of claimants are very important. To explore issues that affect the speed, efficiency, and fairness with which the compensation system for such losses operates in the United States, the RAND Institute for Civil Justice and the RAND Center for Catastrophic Risk Management and Compensation convened a conference on May 19, 2017, in Arlington, Virginia. These conference proceedings explore stakeholder opinions on the changing roles of regulators, the impact of liens, and claim aggregation. Participants discussed how previous cases — particularly the Volkswagen diesel emissions case — provided examples of how regulators and claimants could cooperate to create satisfactory outcomes for both defendants and plaintiffs. They also explored the role of liens in the settlement process and how different aggregation processes (class action, multidistrict litigation, and inventory settlement) affect compensation. Multiple participants argued that collecting more data on the liens and aggregation processes, as well as exploring how other countries approach claim aggregation, would help the legal community better handle compensation issues.

Key Findings

Regulators' Roles

  • Participants agreed that coordination between public and private litigants is becoming more common, but that it is not new and it does not happen all the time.
  • The advantages and disadvantages of increased coordination can be very different from the perspectives of private plaintiffs, the government, and defendants and vary with the particularities of the case.
  • Obstacles to the speedy resolution of complex cases include lack of plaintiff coordination and cooperation, purposeful delay by the defense, lack of coordination between federal and state courts, lack of urgency on the part of judges, lack of transparency, and conflict between government agencies.


  • Lien resolution has become an increasingly important part of the settlement process and can reduce or delay payment to injured parties.
  • Better data on the extent to which liens are discounted and on lien payments as a percentage of settlements are needed.
  • Several participants felt that the procedures for determining liens for future medical costs was an area ripe for legislation, as the current system is not working well.

Claim Aggregation

  • Class actions, quasi–class actions, multidistrict litigation, and inventory settlement all have various potential advantages and disadvantages.
  • More information on the outcomes of the various aggregation procedures, including payments to injured parties, legal fees, and prevalence of fraudulent claims, is needed to better understand how current approaches are working and can be improved upon.

This project is a RAND Venture. Funding was provided by gifts from RAND supporters and income from operations. The conference was convened by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ) and the Center for Catastrophic Risk Management and Compensation (CCRMC) and sponsored by ICJ, CCRMC, and Tom Girardi of Girardi | Keese.

This report is part of the RAND conference proceeding series. RAND conference proceedings present a collection of papers delivered at a conference or a summary of the conference.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.