Improving Combat Support Analyses to Better Inform Decisionmaking

Insights from RAND Research

Published May 22, 2023

Since its inception, RAND Project AIR FORCE has conducted combat support analyses to support U.S. Air Force decisionmaking. This portfolio of work, which reflects a long-term institutional perspective, encompasses enterprise-wide combat support analyses, vulnerability and resiliency analyses, posture and basing analyses, and research that explores how combat support requirements can be considered during the design phase of future systems.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2023
  • Pages: 8
  • Document Number: CP-A2580-3

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Improving Combat Support Analyses to Better Inform Decisionmaking: Insights from RAND Research, RAND Corporation, CP-A2580-3, 2023. As of September 7, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CPA2580-3.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Improving Combat Support Analyses to Better Inform Decisionmaking: Insights from RAND Research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2023. https://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CPA2580-3.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND corporate publication series. Corporate publications include program or department brochures, newsletters, pamphlets, and miscellaneous information about RAND or RAND's business units.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.