Trade-Offs Among Alternative Government Interventions in the Market for Terrorism Insurance
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||7.9 MB|
|PDF file||0.1 MB|
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback132 pages||$48.00||$38.40 20% Web Discount|
This documented briefing presents interim findings from a RAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy project that aims to inform the debate over extending the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA), as modified in 2005. The study uses analytic tools for identifying and assessing key trade-offs among strategies under conditions with considerable uncertainty to assess three alternative government interventions in the market for terrorism insurance: TRIA; no government terrorism insurance program; and extending TRIA without other changes in the program to required insurers to offer coverage for chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) attacks. The results suggest that TRIA performs better on the outcome measures examined for conventional attacks than letting the program expire but does not effectively address the risks CBRN attacks present to either businesses or taxpayers. The research also shows that requiring insurers to offer CBRN coverage without other program changes has little upside for CBRN attacks and can have significant unintended consequences in dealing with conventional attacks.
Table of Contents
Consequences of Allowing TRIA to Expire
Consequences of a Mandatory CBRN Offer Without Other Program Changes
Conclusions and Next Steps
Summary of the Appendixes
Uncertainties, Government Interventions, and Outcome Measures
Take-Up Rate Model
Risk Management Solutions Attack Model
Loss Distribution Model
Robust Decisionmaking Analysis
The research reported here was supported by the RAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy (CTRMP) as part of its larger research program focused on terrorism risk, insurance, and other economically focused issues related to the terrorist threat.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Documented briefing series. RAND documented briefings are based on research presented to a client, sponsor, or targeted audience in briefing format. Additional information is provided in the documented briefing in the form of the written narration accompanying the briefing charts. All RAND documented briefings undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity. However, they are not expected to be comprehensive and may present preliminary findings. Major research findings are published in the monograph series; supporting or preliminary research is published in the technical report series.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.