Learning by Radio in Afghanistan

Distance Learning as an Option for Societies in Crisis

Cheryl Benard

Published 2001

This draft paper examines whether radio can be used to facilitate basic education in Afghanistan, and includes a sample curriculum. The author notes possible problems with and probable limits to attempts to use radio as a learning tool.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2001
  • Paperback Pages: 62
  • Document Number: DRU-2561

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Benard, Cheryl, Learning by Radio in Afghanistan: Distance Learning as an Option for Societies in Crisis, RAND Corporation, DRU-2561, 2001. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2561.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Benard, Cheryl, Learning by Radio in Afghanistan: Distance Learning as an Option for Societies in Crisis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001. https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2561.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other, more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences, similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts have been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.