Does Dissatisfaction with Access to Specialists Affect the Desire to Leave a Managed Care Plan?

Published in: Medical Care Research and Review, v. 55, no. 1, Mar. 1998, p. 59-77

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1998

by Eve A. Kerr, Ron D. Hays, Martin L. Lee, Albert L. Siu

Read More

Access further information on this document at mcr.sagepub.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Frequent changes in health plan enrollment may lead to discontinuity of care and compromise quality. Using multiple logistic regression, the authors investigated how four dimensions of patient satisfaction were associated with the desire to disenroll from a managed care plan. A total of 17,196 enrollees from a large health plan in California responded to a survey regarding their satisfaction with care and desire to disenroll from the plan. Nineteen percent stated that they wanted to change from the plan. Dissatisfaction with access to specialty care and convenience of care produced the highest calculated relative risks of desire to leave the plan (relative risk [RR] = 2.7 and 2.6, respectively), while dissatisfaction with the quality of care and with hospital care produced lower relative risks (1.8 and 1.5, respectively). Because limiting direct access to specialists is a cardinal feature of most managed care organizations, managed care organizations may need to reexamine their approaches to the specialty care referral process.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.