Insurance Status of HIV-Infected Adults in the Post-Haart Era

Evidence from the United States

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, v. 2, no. 2, 2003, p. 85-90

Posted on on January 01, 2003

by Dana P. Goldman, Arleen Leibowitz, Geoffrey F. Joyce, John Fleishman, Samuel A. Bozzette, Naihua Duan, Martin F. Shapiro

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

In the United States, universal public insurance is only available for the elderly. But unlike most other major diseases, HIV/AIDS predominantly affects the nonelderly. The result is that insurance availability and public programme participation are linked to disease progression in a complicated way. This paper uses data from a unique, nationally representative sample of HIV-infected adults receiving medical care, to describe the relationship between disease progression and insurance coverage in the United States. The authors find that public insurance is the predominant source of coverage for those in care for HIV, and that coverage increases as disease progresses. Those with public coverage have substantial work experience and earnings capacity, but do not work. This suggests that reforms allowing HIV positive (+) patients to maintain public coverage while returning to work could increase employment and earnings significantly. More speculatively, it suggests that the United States system for financing health care is not well-equipped to deal with epidemics that afflict a population in its prime work years.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.