Will Public Health's Response to Terrorism Be Fair?

Racial/Ethnic Variations in Perceived Fairness During a Bioterrorist Event

Published in: Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, v. 2, no. 3, 2004, p. 146-156

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2004

by David Eisenman, Cheryl Wold, Claude Messan Setodji, Scot Hickey, Ben Lee, Bradley D. Stein, Anna Long

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.liebertonline.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: Public health departments' effectiveness during catastrophic bioterrorism will require trust on the part of diverse communities. This study describes variations in perceptions that the public health system will respond fairly to one's needs in a bioterrorist event, regardless of race/ethnicity, income, or other characteristics. METHODS: Using the Los Angeles County Health Survey, a random-digit, population-based, telephone survey, the authors conducted multivariate logistic regression of race/ethnicity on perceived fairness, adjusting for demographic factors and perceived neighborhood safety. They performed similar analyses stratified by race/ethnicity subgroup. RESULTS: Overall, 72.7% of respondents perceived that the public health system will respond fairly in a bioterrorist event. African Americans (AA) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (API) reported the lowest perceived fairness (AA 63.0%, API 68.2%, Latino 73.1%, White 76.6%, p < 0.005 for group differences). Adjusting for demographic factors and neighborhood safety, African Americans had lower perceived fairness compared to whites (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 0.45; 95% confidence intervals, CI 0.26-0.79; p < 0.005). Other factors associated with lower perceived fairness included Asian-language compared to English-language interview (aOR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11-0.76; p < 0.05) and lower compared to higher neighborhood safety (aOR 0.48; 95% CI 0.31-0.74; p < 0.005). Among African Americans, participants aged 18-29 years were less likely to report perceived fairness (aOR 0.06; 95% CI 0.01-0.59) compared to participants older than 60 years of age. Among Asian/Pacific Islanders, Asian-language interview (aOR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01-0.48) and lower perceived neighborhood safety (aOR 0.01; 95% CI < 0.01-0.13) were associated with perceived fairness. CONCLUSIONS: To strengthen bioterrorism preparedness, public health officials must continue to improve perceived fairness among African American and Asian/Pacific Islander communities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.