Effect of Primary Care Visits on the Demand for Specialty Care in Health Maintenance Organizations

Published in: Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, v. 4, no. 4, Dec. 2004, p. 203-219

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2004

by Kanika Kapur, Jose J. Escarce

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.springerlink.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) provide low cost access to primary care physicians (PCPs) in an effort to restrict expensive specialty use. Although managed care plans hope that low cost primary care will reduce specialist use, the theoretical effect of easing access to primary care on specialty use is unclear. Despite the importance of estimating the effect of PCP visits on specialty use, no previous studies have directly addressed this question at the enrollee level. This study examines the effect of visits to the PCP on the demand for episodes of specialty care in two health plans: a gatekeeper HMO and a point-of-service plan. Using person-level data, we estimate a generalized method of moments model of specialty episodes that accounts for the endogeneity of PCP visits within a count-data framework. The authors compare this model to three alternative models-an OLS model, a negative binomial model, and a two-stage least squares model. They find evidence that increases in primary care visits increase episodes of specialty care in both plans. The authors also find that the three alternative models yield biased but more efficient estimates compared to the generalized method of moments model.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.