Will Financial Incentives Stimulate Quality Improvement?

Reactions from Frontline Physicians

Published in: American Journal of Medical Quality, v. 21, no. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2006, p. 367-374

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2006

by Stephanie S. Teleki, Cheryl L. Damberg, Chau Pham, Sandra H. Berry

Read More

Access further information on this document at ajm.sagepub.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Pay-for-performance is being applied at the physician level to stimulate improvements in quality of care and cost efficiency; however, little is known about how physicians will respond. The authors interviewed physicians exposed to a financial incentive program in California to identify possible barriers to the successful application of financial incentives by exploring physicians' opinions of and experiences with pay-for-performance programs. Reasons physicians cited for quality deficiencies included insurance coverage limitations and lack of patient compliance, time, and proper physician oversight. Physicians believe that they play a significant role and have a moderate to high degree of control over quality of care and that it is important to self-monitor. Physicians expressed the need for accurate and timely data, peer comparisons, and more patient time, staff support, and consultations with colleagues to successfully monitor and deliver quality care. Many support increased pay for delivering high-quality care but question measurement accuracy, bonus payment financing, and health plan involvement.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.