">

The Intertemporal Stability of Teacher Effect Estimates

Published in: Working Paper 2009 - 22 (Nashville, Tennessee : Vanderbilt University Peabody College, July 2008), p. 1-43

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2008

by Daniel F. McCaffrey, Tim R. Sass, J. R. Lockwood

Recently, a number of school districts have begun using measures of teachers' contributions to student test scores or teacher "value added" to determine salaries and other monetary rewards. In this paper we investigate the precision of value added measures by analyzing their inter-temporal stability. We find that these measures of teacher productivity are only moderately stable over time, with year-to- year correlations in the range of 0.2-0.3. However, dis-attenuated year-to-year correlations are much higher, suggesting that much of the variation in measured teacher performance is due to random error or "noise" in the average test score gains of a teacher's students. We also find that changes to the specification of the achievement model used to generate teacher effects generally have little impact on the stability of the resulting value-added measures. The one exception being when student covariates are used to represent student heterogeneity rather than student fixed effects; in some settings this resulted in a substantial increase in the cross-year correlation. This indicates there may be non-random assignment of students to teachers based on unobserved student characteristics that can affect the stability of teacher effect estimates. Finally, we re-estimate the achievement model using an alternative test score measure. The observed variation in measured teacher performance in some cases changes significantly across tests, implying that changes in the test instrument over time can affect variability in measured teacher effectiveness as well.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.