Money In — Babies Out

Assessing the Long-Term Economic Impact of IVF Funding Policies

Published in: Journal of Medical Ethics, v. 34, no. 9, Sep. 2008, p. 653-654

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2008

by Mark P. Connolly, Stijn Hoorens, William Ledger

Read More

Access further information on this document at jme.bmj.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The authors respond to comments on their investigation of expected future tax gains to the state from children conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF). They establish an economic rationale for the benefits of IVF-conceived children; the difficult question is who should pay the money required to conceive an IVF child.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.