Cover: Coverage and Preventive Screening

Coverage and Preventive Screening

Published in: HSR, Health Services Research, v. 46, no. 1, pt. 1, Feb. 2011, p. 173-184

Posted on 2010

by Daniella Meeker, Geoffrey F. Joyce, Jesse D. Malkin, Steven M. Teutsch, Anne C. Haddix, Dana P. Goldman

CONTEXT: Preventive care has been shown as a high-value health care service. Many employers now offer expanded coverage of preventive care to encourage utilization. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether expanding coverage is an effective means to encourage utilization. DESIGN: Comparison of screening rates before and after introduction of deductible-free coverage. SETTING: People insured through large corporations between 2002 and 2006. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) enrollees from an employer introducing deductible-free coverage, and a control group enrolled in a PPO from a second employer with no policy change. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted probability of endoscopy, fecal occult blood test (FOBT), lipid screens, mammography, and Papanicolaou (pap) smears. INTERVENTION: Introduction of first-dollar coverage (FDC) of preventive services in 2003. RESULTS: After adjusting for demographics and secular trends, there were between 23 and 78 additional uses per 1,000 eligible patients of covered preventive screens (lipid screens, pap smears, mammograms, and FOBT), with no significant changes in the control group or in a service without FDC (endoscopy). CONCLUSIONS: FDC improves utilization modestly among healthy individuals, particularly those in lower deductible plans. Compliance with guidelines can be encouraged by lowering out-of-pocket costs, but patients' predisposing characteristics merit attention.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.