Citizen Preparedness for Disasters
Are Current Assumptions Valid?
ResearchPosted on rand.org Jun 1, 2012Published in: Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, v. 6, no. 2, June 2012, p. 170-173
Despite extensive messaging about the importance of citizen preparedness and countless household surveys purporting to track the preparedness activities of individuals and households, the role individual Americans are being asked to play is largely based on conventional wisdom.
Are Current Assumptions Valid?
ResearchPosted on rand.org Jun 1, 2012Published in: Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, v. 6, no. 2, June 2012, p. 170-173
U.S. government programs and communications regarding citizen preparedness for disasters rest on several untested, and therefore unverified, assumptions. We explore the assumptions related to citizen preparedness promotion and argue that in spite of extensive messaging about the importance of citizen preparedness and countless household surveys purporting to track the preparedness activities of individuals and households, the role individual Americans are being asked to play is largely based on conventional wisdom. Recommendations for conceptualizing and measuring citizen preparedness are discussed.
We need:
This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.