Jan 22, 2015
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a review of the peer-reviewed literature since 2003 to catalogue reported methods of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research.
Published In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, v. 29, no. 12, Dec. 2014, p. 1692-1701
Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2014
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a review of the peer-reviewed literature since 2003 to catalogue reported methods of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research. METHODS AND RESULTS: We worked with stakeholders before, during and after the review was conducted to: define the primary and key research questions; conduct the literature search; screen titles, abstracts and articles; abstract data from the articles; and analyze the data. The literature search yielded 2,062 abstracts. The review was conducted on 70 articles that reported on stakeholder engagement in individual research projects or programs. FINDINGS: Reports of stakeholder engagement are highly variable in content and quality. We found frequent engagement with patients, modestly frequent engagement with clinicians, and infrequent engagement with stakeholders in other key decision-making groups across the healthcare system. Stakeholder engagement was more common in earlier (prioritization) than in later (implementation and dissemination) stages of research. The roles and activities of stakeholders were highly variable across research and program reports. RECOMMENDATIONS: To improve on the quality and content of reporting, we developed a 7-Item Stakeholder Engagement Reporting Questionnaire. We recommend three directions for future research: 1) descriptive research on stakeholder-engagement in research; 2) evaluative research on the impact of stakeholder engagement on the relevance, transparency and adoption of research; and 3) development and validation of tools that can be used to support stakeholder engagement in future work.
A review of 70 peer-reviewed articles shows a large degree of variation in the amount and type of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered research.
Hands-on training opportunities and user-friendly tools and methods for stakeholder recruitment, engagement, and evaluation are needed to help investigators embrace stakeholder engagement in their research projects.
RAND's 7-Item Stakeholder Engagement Reporting Questionnaire will help researchers report more accurately and thoroughly on stakeholder engagement.