Providing Smoking Cessation Programs to Homeless Youth

The Perspective of Service Providers

Published in: Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, v. 47, no. 4, Oct. 2014, p. 251-257

Posted on on October 01, 2014

by William G. Shadel, Joan S. Tucker, Leslie Mullins, B. Lynette Staplefoote

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Question

  1. Do homeless youth in Los Angeles County currently receive services to help them quit smoking?

There is almost no information available on cigarette smoking among homeless youth, whether they are currently receiving services for smoking cessation, and how to best help them quit. This paper presents data collected from a series of semi-structured telephone interviews with service providers from 23 shelters and drop-in centers serving homeless youth in Los Angeles County about their current smoking cessation programming, interest in providing smoking cessation services to their clients, potential barriers to providing this service, and ways to overcome these barriers. Results indicated that 84% of facilities did not offer smoking cessation services, although nearly all (91%) were interested in doing so. Barriers to implementing formal smoking cessation programs on site included lack of resources (e.g., money, personnel) to support the programs, staff training, and concern that smoking cessation may not be a high priority for homeless youth themselves. Overall, service providers seemed to prefer a less intensive smoking cessation program that could be delivered at their site by existing staff. Data from this formative needs assessment will be useful for developing and evaluating a smoking cessation treatment that could be integrated into the busy, complex environment that characterizes agencies that serve homeless youth.

Key Findings

  • Almost all shelters and drop-in centers serving homeless youth in L.A. County are interested in offering smoking cessation programs, but the vast majority of them do not.
  • Lack of resources and staff training are cited as barriers.
  • Service providers seem to prefer a less intensive, on-site program that their own staff could offer.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.