Mental Health Treatment Experiences of U.S. Service Members Previously Deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan

Published in: Psychiatric Services, v. 64, no. 3, Mar. 2013, p. 277-279

by Eunice C. Wong, Terry L. Schell, Lisa H. Jaycox, Grant N. Marshall, Terri Tanielian, Jeremy N. V. Miles

Read More

Access further information on this document at Psychiatric Services

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the mental health treatment experiences of active-duty U.S. service members who received treatment from primary care or specialty mental health providers. METHODS: A national sample of active-duty service members (N=1,659) was surveyed about mental health treatment experiences. RESULTS: About 17% of respondents reported receipt of mental health care in the prior 12 months. Three times as many service members had seen a specialty mental health provider (14%) as had seen a primary care provider (5%). Of those who had seen a specialty provider, 79% thought treatment helped "a lot or some" and none stated that treatment was "not at all" helpful. Of those who had seen a primary care provider, only 51% thought treatment had helped a lot or some and 15% viewed treatment as not helping at all. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of utilization and perceptions of treatment should be considered when addressing the unmet mental health needs of service members.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.