Exposure to Pro-Smoking Media in College Students

Does Type of Media Channel Differentially Contribute to Smoking Risk?

William G. Shadel, Steven C. Martino, Claude Messan Setodji, Deborah M. Scharf

ResearchPosted on rand.org 2013Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, v. 45, no. 3, June 2013, p. 387-392

BACKGROUND: There are almost no data on whether the different channels through which pro-smoking media appear (i.e., point-of-sale advertising, movie smoking) differently influence smoking. PURPOSE: This study used ecological momentary assessment to examine whether differences in smoking risk were observed for exposures to different pro-smoking media channels. METHODS: College students (n  = 134) carried smartphones for 21 days, recording their exposures to pro-smoking media and the media channels for that exposure and responding to three randomly issued control prompts per day. Participants answered questions about their future smoking risk after each pro-smoking media exposure and random prompt. RESULTS: Participants had elevated future smoking risk following exposure to pro-smoking media at point of sale (p < 0.001); smoking risk at times of exposure to smoking in movies did not differ from risk measured during control prompts (p = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: There is merit to examining the relative contribution of different pro-smoking media channels to smoking behavior.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2013
  • Pages: 7
  • Document Number: EP-51406

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.