Does Targeting Higher Health Risk Employees or Increasing Intervention Intensity Yield Savings in a Workplace Wellness Program?

Published in: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, v. 57, no. 12, Dec. 2015, p. 1257-1261

Posted on on January 05, 2016

by Kandice A. Kapinos, John P. Caloyeras, Harry H. Liu, Soeren Mattke

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: This article aims to test whether a workplace wellness program reduces health care cost for higher risk employees or employees with greater participation. METHODS: The program effect on costs was estimated using a generalized linear model with a log-link function using a difference-in-difference framework with a propensity score matched sample of employees using claims and program data from a large US firm from 2003 to 2011. RESULTS: The program targeting higher risk employees did not yield cost savings. Employees participating in five or more sessions aimed at encouraging more healthful living had about $20 lower per member per month costs relative to matched comparisons (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results add to the growing evidence base that workplace wellness programs aimed at primary prevention do not reduce health care cost, with the exception of those employees who choose to participate more actively.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.