Saving Transatlantic Cooperation and the Iran Nuclear Deal

A View from Europe and the United States

Corentin Brustlein, James Dobbins, Dalia Dassa Kaye, Oliver Meier, Marco Overhaus, Neil Quilliam, Charles P. Ries, Dorothee Schmid, Sanam Vakil, Azadeh Zamirirad

ResearchPosted on rand.org Feb 16, 2018Published in: SWP Comment, 2018/C 09 (February 2018)

Transatlantic differences over the future of the Iran nuclear deal — or the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) of July 2015 — are damaging a nuclear accord that all parties, except the United States, see as delivering on its purpose. They also increase the risk of Washington and European capitals working at cross-purposes vis-a-vis Iran and broader regional policies. To avoid such a scenario, the E3 (France, Germany, United Kingdom)/European Union (EU) and the United States need to set up new channels of communication to avoid a transatlantic rift, to attempt — if at all possible — to preserve the Iran deal, and to secure its benefits for regional and global security.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2018
  • Pages: 4
  • Document Number: EP-67500

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.