Are Content-Specific Curricula Differentially Effective in Head Start or State Prekindergarten Classrooms?

Published in: AERA Open, Volume 4, Number 2 (April-June 2018), Pages 1 -17. doi: 10.1177/2332858418784283

Posted on RAND.org on June 29, 2018

by Tutrang Nguyen, Jade M. Jenkins, Anamarie A. Whitaker

Read More

Access further information on this document at AERA Open

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Head Start and state prekindergarten (pre-K) programs can boost the school readiness of low-income children through the use of effective preschool curricula. Encouraging results from some studies suggest that children who receive targeted or content-specific curricular supplements (e.g., literacy or math) during preschool show moderate to large improvements in that targeted content domain, but recent research also suggests differences in children's school readiness among different preschool program settings. We examine whether children in Head Start or public pre-K classrooms differentially benefit from the use of randomly assigned classroom curricula targeting specific academic domains. Our results indicate that children in both Head Start and public pre-K classrooms benefit from targeted, content-specific curricula. Future research is needed to examine the specific mechanisms and classroom processes through which curricula help improve children's outcomes

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.