The Challenge of Determining Appropriate Care in the Era of Patient-Centered Care and Rising Health Care Costs

Published in: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Volume 24, Issue 3, pages 201-206 (December 2018). doi: 10.1177/1355819618815521

Posted on RAND.org on December 12, 2019

by Ian D. Coulter, Patricia M. Herman, Gery W. Ryan, Lara Hilton, Ron D. Hays

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Appropriateness of care is typically determined in the United States by evidence on efficacy and safety, combined with the judgments of experts in research and clinical practice, but without consideration of the cost of care or patient preferences. The shift in focus towards patient-centered care calls for consideration of outcomes that are important to patients, accommodation of patient preferences, and incorporation of the costs of care in patient-provider shared clinical decisions. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method was designed to determine rates of appropriate or inappropriate care, but the method did not include patient preferences or costs. This essay examines how methods of studying appropriateness can be made more patient-centered by describing a modification of the RAND/UCLA method by including patient outcomes, preferences, and costs.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.