Changes in ART Adherence Relate to Changes in Depression as Well!

Evidence for the Bi-directional Longitudinal Relationship Between Depression and ART Adherence from a Prospective Study of HIV Clients in Uganda

Published in: AIDS and Behavior (2019). doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02754-8

Posted on on May 12, 2020

by Glenn Wagner, Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar, Barbara Mukasa, Sebastian Linnemayr

Read More

Access further information on this document at Springer Nature

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Studies have documented how levels and change in depression correspond to ART non-adherence. However, few studies have examined how levels of and change in adherence may relate to levels of and change in depression, although one might expect mental health to be related to physical health and how successful one is in managing disease. To assess the bidirectional nature of the association between these two constructs, we examined data from a prospective trial of an ART adherence intervention in Uganda that followed 143 participants over 20 months. Adherence was measured using electronic monitoring caps; non-adherence was defined as missing > 10% of prescribed doses; self-reported depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and PHQ-9 > 4 defined the presence of at least minor depression. Adjusted linear and logistic regression models were used to examine the longitudinal relationships between depression and non-adherence. At baseline, 40.6% had at least minor depression and 37.1% were non-adherent. Time varying change in the classification of depression (e.g., becoming depressed) predicted change in non-adherence status (e.g., becoming non-adherent), and this association remained when examining continuous measures of the constructs. Similarly, time varying measures of increases in non-adherence predicted increases in depression, regardless of whether continuous or binary classification measures were used. A temporal trend of increased non-adherence over time was observed, and this was accelerated by an increase in depression. Furthermore, those who had at least minor depression at baseline were more likely to be non-adherent at follow-up. These findings support the potential benefits of depression care and adherence support for improving adherence and mental health, respectively, and call for further research to examine such benefits.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.