How Did the Reintroduction of the Social Security Statement Change Workers' Expectations and Plans?

Published in: Social Security Bulletin, Volume 80, No. 4, pages 23–38 (November 2020)

by Philip Armour

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This article examines how the reintroduction of Social Security Statement mailings from September 2014 through December 2016 affected recipients' expectations about Social Security benefits and their benefit claiming decisions. During the reintroduction period, Statements were mailed to workers reaching multiple-of-5 ages, enabling a comparison of results for 2016 recipients, 2014/2015 recipients, and reintroduction-period nonrecipients. I fielded a specialized American Life Panel (ALP) survey to elicit recall of and reactions to receiving the Statement and used earlier ALP modules to control for respondents' prior Social Security knowledge. I find that recipients remember and value the information provided in the Statement, although the effects quickly diminish after receipt. Recipients were likelier than nonrecipients to expect future benefits but were also more likely to expect Congress to enact future benefit cuts. Married female recipients were more likely to expect spousal benefits, and recipients overall were more likely to change their planned claiming age.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.