Online Modified-Delphi

A Potential Method for Continuous Patient Engagement Across Stages of Clinical Practice Guideline Development

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine (2021). doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06514-6

Posted on on March 31, 2021

by Sean Grant, Courtney Armstrong, Dmitry Khodyakov

Read More

Access further information on this document at Springer

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Patient engagement has become a key component and indicator of high-quality development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Engaging patients in CPG development respects their expertise in the lived experience of clinical conditions and aims to create more patient-centered guideline recommendations. As this area of guideline development has matured, guideline development groups and other healthcare policy stakeholders are interested in shifting from engagement of a limited number of patients at isolated phases of CPG development to more in-depth, continuous engagement of a larger group of patients across all stages of the development process. Frameworks for continuous patient engagement in CPG development have highlighted various approaches to identify the preferences and perspectives of patients, caregivers, and other patient representatives by using surveys, focus groups, and representation on guideline development groups.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.