Innovating Innovation in the U.S. Department of Defense Looking to Large Corporations for Inspiration

Published in: Journal of Management Policy and Practice, Volume 22, No. 4 (2021). doi: 10.33423/jmpp.v22i4.4840

by John Birkler, Paul Bracken, Gordon T. Lee

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Management Policy and Practice

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

In recent years U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) leaders have become increasingly interested in identifying ways to create a culture, policies, and processes throughout the department that yield more innovation than today's environment produces. Many definitions of innovation that the policy community has used, however, have not been clear or intellectually rigorous. Common belief holds that "the bureaucracy" will take charge of the innovation process, with DoD organizing around what are effectively technologies, rather than missions or defeating the enemy. But this paper argues that this approach could hamper U.S. technological performance. The authors propose an alternative innovation framework, one that is policy-oriented, that draws from contemporary commercial practices, and that helps policymakers determine where and when to invest in innovations. In addition, the authors argue that the challenges facing the DoD are closer to those of large companies than to those faced by agile small startups. They conclude by proposing that it is to the DoD examine ways that large companies incorporate AI, IoT and analytics to obtain practical lessons.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.