Conceptual Framework for Understanding Incident Management Systems During Public Health Emergencies
ResearchPosted on rand.org Jun 1, 2022Published in: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (2022). doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.77
ResearchPosted on rand.org Jun 1, 2022Published in: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (2022). doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.77
Effective incident management is essential for coordinating efforts of multiple disciplines and stakeholders when responding to emergencies, including public health disasters such as the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Existing research frameworks tend to focus on formal structures and doctrine (eg, ICS-NIMS); however, organizational processes that underlie incident management have not been systematically assessed and synthesized into a coherent conceptual framework.
The lack of a framework has hindered the development of measures of performance that could be used to further develop the evidence base and facilitate process improvement. To address this gap, we present a conceptual framework of incident management drawn from expert feedback and a review of literature on incident management and related fields. The framework features 23 measurement constructs grouped into 5 domains: (1) situational awareness and information sharing, (2) incident action and implementation planning, (3) resource management and mobilization, (4) coordination and collaboration, and (5) feedback and continuous quality improvement.
As such, the article provides a first step toward the development of robust measures for assessing the performance and effectiveness of incident management systems.
This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.